[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CC17CF1.4000109@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 08:00:49 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"Li, Shaohua" <shaohua.li@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Avoid possible deadlock caused by too_many_isolated()
On 10/22/2010 12:55 AM, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> Now !GFP_IOFS reclaims won't be waiting for GFP_IOFS reclaims to
> progress. They will be blocked only when there are too many concurrent
> !GFP_IOFS reclaims, however that's very unlikely because the IO-less
> direct reclaims is able to progress much more faster, and they won't
> deadlock each other. The threshold is raised high enough for them, so
> that there can be sufficient parallel progress of !GFP_IOFS reclaims.
>
> CC: Torsten Kaiser<just.for.lkml@...glemail.com>
> CC: Minchan Kim<minchan.kim@...il.com>
> Tested-by: NeilBrown<neilb@...e.de>
> Acked-by: KOSAKI Motohiro<kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang<fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
--
All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists