[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1010221526080.29540@localhost6.localdomain6>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 15:27:18 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
cc: peterz@...radead.org, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...e.hu,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: User Mode Linux broken
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Oct 2010, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Well, nothing is supposed to call enable_irq() before an interrupt is
> installed with request_irq() or setup_irq().
>
> Patch below should fix your problem.
Yuck. Missed the second instance. Updated patch below.
Thanks,
tglx
---
diff --git a/arch/um/kernel/irq.c b/arch/um/kernel/irq.c
index a746e30..97e204b 100644
--- a/arch/um/kernel/irq.c
+++ b/arch/um/kernel/irq.c
@@ -395,13 +395,11 @@ void __init init_IRQ(void)
irq_desc[TIMER_IRQ].action = NULL;
irq_desc[TIMER_IRQ].depth = 1;
irq_desc[TIMER_IRQ].chip = &SIGVTALRM_irq_type;
- enable_irq(TIMER_IRQ);
for (i = 1; i < NR_IRQS; i++) {
irq_desc[i].status = IRQ_DISABLED;
irq_desc[i].action = NULL;
irq_desc[i].depth = 1;
irq_desc[i].chip = &normal_irq_type;
- enable_irq(i);
}
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists