linux-kernel - Re: On Linux numbering scheme

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4CC190D2.6070305@sapience.com>
Date:	Fri, 22 Oct 2010 09:25:38 -0400
From:	Genes MailLists <lists@...ience.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: On Linux numbering scheme

On 10/22/2010 06:41 AM, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Artem S. Tashkinov <t.artem@...os.com> wrote:
>> What can you say about kernel 2.6.32? Almost nothing.
>>
>> What can you say about kernel 3.11.3? - it is the third release of
>> Linux in 2011.
> 
> And? What a useless information.
> 
> BTW, it should be 3.2011.3, see Y2K.
> --

   If you -really- wanna go that route - may as well be

      20.11.3.18

    century.decade.month.day .. that way we don't have problem until we
hit the year 10,000 ... :-)


  g
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/