[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CC1C77C.1000700@pobox.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 13:18:52 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
CC: Nicolas Kaiser <nikai@...ai.net>,
Antonino Daplas <adaplas@...il.com>,
linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rivafb: dubious assignment
On 10/22/2010 10:47 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 13:31, Nicolas Kaiser<nikai@...ai.net> wrote:
>> A duplicated assignment unconditionally changes max_gfsize to
>> GFIFO_SIZE.
>>
>> It looks to me like this might not be intended, or is it?
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Kaiser<nikai@...ai.net>
>> ---
>> drivers/video/riva/riva_hw.c | 1 -
>> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/video/riva/riva_hw.c b/drivers/video/riva/riva_hw.c
>> index 78fdbf5..936abfa 100644
>> --- a/drivers/video/riva/riva_hw.c
>> +++ b/drivers/video/riva/riva_hw.c
>> @@ -263,7 +263,6 @@ static int nv3_iterate(nv3_fifo_info *res_info, nv3_sim_state * state, nv3_arb_i
>> vmisses = 2;
>> if (ainfo->gburst_size == 128) max_gfsize = GFIFO_SIZE_128;
>> else max_gfsize = GFIFO_SIZE;
>> - max_gfsize = GFIFO_SIZE;
>> while (1)
>> {
>> if (ainfo->vid_en)
>> --
>> 1.7.2.2
>
> According to full-history-linux, this comes from the initial drop in 2.3.49pre2,
> from nVidia code(?), imported by Jeff Garzik.
Yep, came straight from X.org driver code... Patch certainly looks
correct, but who knows but NV for sure :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists