[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20101022184033.920409577@clark.site>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 11:39:41 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc: stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>
Subject: [16/17] execve: improve interactivity with large arguments
2.6.27-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
------------------
From: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
commit 7993bc1f4663c0db67bb8f0d98e6678145b387cd upstream.
This adds a preemption point during the copying of the argument and
environment strings for execve, in copy_strings(). There is already
a preemption point in the count() loop, so this doesn't add any new
points in the abstract sense.
When the total argument+environment strings are very large, the time
spent copying them can be much more than a normal user time slice.
So this change improves the interactivity of the rest of the system
when one process is doing an execve with very large arguments.
Signed-off-by: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
---
fs/exec.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
--- a/fs/exec.c
+++ b/fs/exec.c
@@ -436,6 +436,8 @@ static int copy_strings(int argc, char _
while (len > 0) {
int offset, bytes_to_copy;
+ cond_resched();
+
offset = pos % PAGE_SIZE;
if (offset == 0)
offset = PAGE_SIZE;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists