linux-kernel - [27/66] hrtimer: Preserve timer state in remove

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20101022183558.640991137@clark.site>
Date:	Fri, 22 Oct 2010 11:34:54 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc:	stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	Salman Qazi <sqazi@...gle.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: [27/66] hrtimer: Preserve timer state in remove_hrtimer()

2.6.32-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------

From: Salman Qazi <sqazi@...gle.com>

commit f13d4f979c518119bba5439dd2364d76d31dcd3f upstream.

The race is described as follows:

CPU X                                 CPU Y
remove_hrtimer
// state & QUEUED == 0
timer->state = CALLBACK
unlock timer base
timer->f(n) //very long
                                  hrtimer_start
                                    lock timer base
                                    remove_hrtimer // no effect
                                    hrtimer_enqueue
                                    timer->state = CALLBACK |
                                                   QUEUED
                                    unlock timer base
                                  hrtimer_start
                                    lock timer base
                                    remove_hrtimer
                                        mode = INACTIVE
                                        // CALLBACK bit lost!
                                    switch_hrtimer_base
                                            CALLBACK bit not set:
                                                    timer->base
                                                    changes to a
                                                    different CPU.
lock this CPU's timer base

The bug was introduced with commit ca109491f (hrtimer: removing all ur
callback modes) in 2.6.29

[ tglx: Feed new state via local variable and add a comment. ]

Signed-off-by: Salman Qazi <sqazi@...gle.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
LKML-Reference: <20101012142351.8485.21823.stgit@...gbeetle.mtv.corp.google.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>

---
 kernel/hrtimer.c |   13 +++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/hrtimer.c
+++ b/kernel/hrtimer.c
@@ -920,6 +920,7 @@ static inline int
 remove_hrtimer(struct hrtimer *timer, struct hrtimer_clock_base *base)
 {
 	if (hrtimer_is_queued(timer)) {
+		unsigned long state;
 		int reprogram;
 
 		/*
@@ -933,8 +934,13 @@ remove_hrtimer(struct hrtimer *timer, st
 		debug_deactivate(timer);
 		timer_stats_hrtimer_clear_start_info(timer);
 		reprogram = base->cpu_base == &__get_cpu_var(hrtimer_bases);
-		__remove_hrtimer(timer, base, HRTIMER_STATE_INACTIVE,
-				 reprogram);
+		/*
+		 * We must preserve the CALLBACK state flag here,
+		 * otherwise we could move the timer base in
+		 * switch_hrtimer_base.
+		 */
+		state = timer->state & HRTIMER_STATE_CALLBACK;
+		__remove_hrtimer(timer, base, state, reprogram);
 		return 1;
 	}
 	return 0;
@@ -1221,6 +1227,9 @@ static void __run_hrtimer(struct hrtimer
 		BUG_ON(timer->state != HRTIMER_STATE_CALLBACK);
 		enqueue_hrtimer(timer, base);
 	}
+
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(!(timer->state & HRTIMER_STATE_CALLBACK));
+
 	timer->state &= ~HRTIMER_STATE_CALLBACK;
 }
 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/