linux-kernel - [057/103] x86, numa: For each node, register the memory blocks actually used

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20101022185232.488125117@clark.site>
Date:	Fri, 22 Oct 2010 11:51:31 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc:	stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [057/103] x86, numa: For each node, register the memory blocks actually used

2.6.35-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------

From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>

commit 73cf624d029d776a33d0a80c695485b3f9b36231 upstream.

Russ reported SGI UV is broken recently. He said:

| The SRAT table shows that memory range is spread over two nodes.
|
| SRAT: Node 0 PXM 0 100000000-800000000
| SRAT: Node 1 PXM 1 800000000-1000000000
| SRAT: Node 0 PXM 0 1000000000-1080000000
|
|Previously, the kernel early_node_map[] would show three entries
|with the proper node.
|
|[    0.000000]     0: 0x00100000 -> 0x00800000
|[    0.000000]     1: 0x00800000 -> 0x01000000
|[    0.000000]     0: 0x01000000 -> 0x01080000
|
|The problem is recent community kernel early_node_map[] shows
|only two entries with the node 0 entry overlapping the node 1
|entry.
|
|    0: 0x00100000 -> 0x01080000
|    1: 0x00800000 -> 0x01000000

After looking at the changelog, Found out that it has been broken for a while by
following commit

|commit 8716273caef7f55f39fe4fc6c69c5f9f197f41f1
|Author: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
|Date:   Fri Sep 25 15:20:04 2009 -0700
|
|    x86: Export srat physical topology

Before that commit, register_active_regions() is called for every SRAT memory
entry right away.

Use nodememblk_range[] instead of nodes[] in order to make sure we
capture the actual memory blocks registered with each node.  nodes[]
contains an extended range which spans all memory regions associated
with a node, but that does not mean that all the memory in between are
included.

Reported-by: Russ Anderson <rja@....com>
Tested-by: Russ Anderson <rja@....com>
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
LKML-Reference: <4CB27BDF.5000800@...nel.org>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>

---
 arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c |    8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
@@ -420,9 +420,11 @@ int __init acpi_scan_nodes(unsigned long
 		return -1;
 	}
 
-	for_each_node_mask(i, nodes_parsed)
-		e820_register_active_regions(i, nodes[i].start >> PAGE_SHIFT,
-						nodes[i].end >> PAGE_SHIFT);
+	for (i = 0; i < num_node_memblks; i++)
+		e820_register_active_regions(memblk_nodeid[i],
+				node_memblk_range[i].start >> PAGE_SHIFT,
+				node_memblk_range[i].end >> PAGE_SHIFT);
+
 	/* for out of order entries in SRAT */
 	sort_node_map();
 	if (!nodes_cover_memory(nodes)) {


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/