[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CC1E18E.9040502@goop.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:10:06 -0700
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC: Xen Devel <Xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Gianluca Guida <gianluca.guida@...rix.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the xen tree with the tip tree
On 10/21/2010 08:03 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the xen tree got a conflict in
> arch/x86/mm/init_32.c between commit
> 1d931264af0f10649b35afa8fbd2e169da51ac08 ("x86-32, memblock: Make
> add_highpages honor early reserved ranges") from the tip tree and commit
> 07147a06ac3b1b028124ea00ba44e69eb8ea7685 ("x86/32: honor reservations of
> high memory") from the xen tree.
Hm, that change has been completely obsoleted by the memblock stuff from
tip. Oh, I see. Another change which ended up reverting that patch via
a merge got dropped, so it got left lying around. I'll pull it out.
(Not sure why it merges cleanly for me however; I guess because you've
already got the older xen branch in there which contains the merge.)
Anyway, update pushed.
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists