[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20101022133138.6d82f79a.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 13:31:38 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>
Cc: Luca Barbieri <luca@...a-barbieri.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib/atomic64_test: do not build on non-atomic64 systems
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 16:14:49 -0400
Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 19:24, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:04:36 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> you can say "lazy" all you like. __i dont see the point in going that route.
> >
> > Try
> >
> > __ __ __ __grep HAVE arch/x86/Kconfig
> >
> > If all of those were instead to use some random #define which the
> > particular feature happened to define in some header file then we would
> > have a mess on our hands.
>
> fun times. new tact.
>
> Luca: your new atomic64_t test build fails on all arches that lack
> atomic64_t. please fix.
That's only part of the problem. The following won't build also:
net/rds
kernel/perf_event.c
drivers/staging/octeon
drivers/infiniband/hw
with more to come. These things should be made dependent upon
CONFIG_HAVE_ATOMIC64 in Kconfig. (Can't use #ifdef ATOMIC64_INIT for this!)
Or, much better, we implement atomic64 on the offending architectures.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists