[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101022214650.GL10119@count0.beaverton.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 14:46:50 -0700
From: Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>
To: Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
"akpm >> Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] cgroups: Make freezer subsystem bindable
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 01:57:55PM -0700, Matt Helsley wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 04:11:41PM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> > To make it bindable, we need to thaw all processes when unbinding
> > the freezer subsystem from a cgroup hierarchy.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
<snip>
>
> Alternately you could split the bind/unbind op function pointers
> and get rid of the boolean argument. Then just don't fill in the
> freezer's unbind op and refuse to unbind subsystems that lack
> the unbind op. That seems a bit cleaner for now at least.
Or alternately to the alternate :): add a can_unbind:1 field and keep
the boolean bind op argument. That might be best -- avoids an extra
function pointer and still splits the bind/unbind-ability of a
subsystem.
Cheers,
-Matt Helsley
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists