[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CC208BA.2080506@goop.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 14:57:14 -0700
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
CC: kevin granade <kevin.granade@...il.com>,
"Artem S. Tashkinov" <t.artem@...os.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: On Linux numbering scheme
On 10/21/2010 07:00 PM, Al Viro wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 07:06:23PM -0500, kevin granade wrote:
>
>> Any particular reason not to continue the date-oriented format and
>> have the third number be the numerical representation of the month
>> rather than an incrementing numbering of the releases? It would still
>> be monotonically increasing, which is the only requirement, right?
> Why do we need to change it, anyway?
>
> Al, fully expecting to be whined at for discouraging potential contributors
> and horribly damaging Linux ecosystem by artificially increasing the entry
> barrier, or something...
I think it should be blue.
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists