linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -V21 00/12] Generic name to handle and open by handle syscalls

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 24 Oct 2010 20:33:23 +0530
From:	"Aneesh Kumar K. V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	hch@...radead.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, adilger@....com,
	corbet@....net, neilb@...e.de, npiggin@...nel.dk,
	hooanon05@...oo.co.jp, bfields@...ldses.org, miklos@...redi.hu
Cc:	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, sfrench@...ibm.com,
	philippe.deniel@....FR, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -V21 00/12] Generic name to handle and open by handle syscalls

On Tue,  5 Oct 2010 15:52:08 +0530, "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> The below set of patches implement open by handle support using exportfs
> operations. This allows user space application to map a file name to file
> handle and later open the file using handle. This should be usable
> for userspace NFS [1] and 9P server [2]. XFS already support this with the ioctls
> XFS_IOC_PATH_TO_HANDLE and XFS_IOC_OPEN_BY_HANDLE.
> 
> [1] http://nfs-ganesha.sourceforge.net/
> [2] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/68992
> 
> git repo for the patchset at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvaneesh/linux-open-handle.git open-by-handle
> 
> Test case can be found at
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=fs/ext2/kvaneesh/handle-test.git
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/ext2/kvaneesh/handle-test.git
> 
> Changes from V20:
> a) Use better variable names
> b) change handle_size type to __u32
> c) max handle size is now nfsv4 handle size. Considering file system would
>    want to support a handle that can fit into nfsv4 handle size limiting
>    max handle size to 128 rather than 4096 is the right thing.
> d) I didn't add Ceph changes in the series. I am expecting the changes
>    will go via Ceph tree.
> 

Hi Al,

Any update on this ? Can we get this merged in this merge window.

-aneesh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/