[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2DEEA3AB13739D45A22ADDB5086AEA0B7AF518@sshaexmb1.amd.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 17:10:50 +0800
From: "Xu, Andiry" <Andiry.Xu@....com>
To: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
CC: "Nguyen, Dong" <Dong.Nguyen@....com>,
"Yang, Libin" <Libin.Yang@....com>,
<sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com>, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: XHCI: sleep inside atomic
Hmm....You're right. Thanks for catching this, I'll submit a patch
later.
Thanks & Best regards,
Andiry
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jiri Slaby [mailto:jirislaby@...il.com]
> Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2010 4:17 PM
> To: Xu, Andiry
> Cc: Nguyen, Dong; Yang, Libin; sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com; Greg KH;
USB
> list; LKML
> Subject: XHCI: sleep inside atomic
>
> Hi,
>
> Stanse found that commit
> USB: xHCI: PCI power management implementation
> added xhci_setup_msix->kmalloc(GFP_KERNEL) and request_irq inside
> xhci->lock spinlock. As these functions may sleep, this is
deadlockable.
> Could you fix that?
>
> thanks,
> --
> js
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists