| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 15:44:44 +0530 From: Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@...e.de> To: "J.A. Magallón" <jamagallon@....com> Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: CIFS is slooow, gvfs is fast On 10/24/2010 05:00 AM, J.A. Magallón wrote: > On Sat, 23 Oct 2010 00:46:36 +0200, "J.A. Magall�n" <jamagallon@....com> wrote: > >> >> If you mean hardware network path (cabling, router), yes. >> For file paths, CIFS fs is under /net/htpc/media, and gvfs uses a mount >> point on '~/.gvfs/media on htpc'. >> >> And here comes the weird part. To rule out the desktop environment factor, >> I tried a dd in both paths. On /net, I get 16.6 MB/s, and on >> ~/.gvfs/xxx, I just get 5.5 MB/s. I really don't understand anything... >> things get reversed depending if you use a gui or commandline. >> >> Weird, really weird... >> > > Well, to sort things out, I did some more tests (this does not mean things > get any closer to be clear for me at least...). > > Can anybody tell me whats going here...?? > It looks just like gui tools behave just in reverse of cli, and that a plain > smbclient is faster that cifs. I'm really confused... > Could you try mounting from commandline with something like `mount -t cifs //server/share /mnt/point -o user=user1` (commenting out the fstab entry) and try copying the file? -- Suresh Jayaraman -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists