linux-kernel - Re: BUG with the kernel version 2.6.36-rc1 on power machine

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4CC563A9.3020308@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Mon, 25 Oct 2010 16:32:01 +0530
From:	divya <dipraksh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>
CC:	Subrata Modak <subrata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linuxppc-dev <Linuxppc-dev@...abs.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Subject: Re: BUG with the kernel version 2.6.36-rc1 on power machine

On Saturday 23 October 2010 03:06 PM, Yong Zhang wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 12:43:21AM +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
>    
>> This is equally seen for both Power6 and Power7 machines.
>>      
> Seems resolved by part of http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/10/13/67
>
> Thanks,
> Yong
>
>    
>> Regards--
>> Subrata
>>
>> On Sat, 2010-10-23 at 00:37 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
>>      
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: divya<dipraksh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>> Date: Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 1:10 PM
>>> Subject: Re: BUG with the kernel version 2.6.36-rc1 on power machine
>>> To: LKML<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
>>> linuxppc-dev@...abs.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Friday 22 October 2010 12:50 PM, divya wrote:
>>>          Hi ,
>>>
>>>          With the latest version of kernel 2.6.36-rc1 running on the
>>>          power machine, came across the following call trace
>>>
>>>          BUG: looking up invalid subclass: 31
>>>          turning off the locking correctness validator.
>>>          Call Trace:
>>>          [c00000000e0bfb60] [c0000000000119a0] .show_stack+0x6c/0x16c
>>>          (unreliable)
>>>          [c00000000e0bfc10] [c0000000000c39b8] .lockdep_init_map
>>>          +0x194/0x630
>>>          [c00000000e0bfcf0] [c0000000005524f8] .mousedev_create
>>>          +0xcc/0x234
>>>          [c00000000e0bfda0] [c00000000093fb58] .mousedev_init+0x38/0xa0
>>>          [c00000000e0bfe30] [c0000000000097e4] .do_one_initcall
>>>          +0xd8/0x1c8
>>>          [c00000000e0bfee0] [c0000000009004ac] .kernel_init+0x23c/0x2f8
>>>          [c00000000e0bff90] [c00000000002ad30] .kernel_thread+0x54/0x70
>>>
>>>          The config file used for make oldconfig is being attached
>>>
>>>          Thanks
>>>          Divya
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I meant 2.6.36-git1(b5153163ed580e) , and not 2.6.36-rc1.
>>> Sorry for the confusion.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Divya
>>>
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
>>> linux-kernel" in
>>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Regards&  Thanks--
>>> Subrata
>>>        
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>>      
The patch at
http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/10/13/67 resolves the issue.

But this is not a part of 2.6.36-git6 , when will it be pulled into the upstream?

Thanks
Divya

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/