[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CC5FC99.8090203@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 14:54:33 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
CC: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Koki Sanagi <sanagi.koki@...fujitsu.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
nhorman@...driver.com, scott.a.mcmillan@...el.com,
laijs@...fujitsu.com, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
eric.dumazet@...il.com, kaneshige.kenji@...fujitsu.com,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com,
kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: Cleanup the convoluted softirq tracepoints
On 10/20/2010 08:27 AM, Jason Baron wrote:
>
> sure. The idea of the 'jmp 0' was simply to be an lcd for x86, if
> there's a better lcd for x86, I'll update it. But note, that since the
> 'jmp 0' is patched to a better nop at boot, we wouldn't see much gain.
> And in the boot path we are using 'text_poke_early()', so avoiding that
> isn't going to improve things much.
>
It's still a completely unnecessary waste of startup time some
potentially significant fraction of the time. Startup time matters,
especially as the number of tracepoints grow.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists