linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for October 25 (coda)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20101026105239.e3866312.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Tue, 26 Oct 2010 10:52:39 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Cc:	coda@...cmu.edu, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for October 25 (coda)

Hi Randy,

On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 16:33:39 -0700 Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> The coda BKL fixes (git tree) are not in here yet, right?

I have no coda tree in linux-next (hint, hint :-)).  However, there were
a few coda patches went into Linus' tree overnight (my time).

> fs/coda/* currently has 12 warnings like these:
> 
> fs/coda/psdev.c:140: error: implicit declaration of function 'lock_kernel'
> fs/coda/psdev.c:142: error: implicit declaration of function 'unlock_kernel'

Hopefully these are fixed today by the above commits?

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped