linux-kernel - Re: [NAK] Re: [PATCH -v2 9/9] ACPI, APEI, Generic Hardware Error Source POLL/IRQ/NMI notification type support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1288078222.2862.484.camel@yhuang-dev>
Date:	Tue, 26 Oct 2010 15:30:22 +0800
From:	Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <petkovbb@...glemail.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>,
	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [NAK] Re: [PATCH -v2 9/9] ACPI, APEI, Generic Hardware Error
 Source POLL/IRQ/NMI notification type support

On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 15:22 +0800, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> 
> > >From Kconfig:
> > 
> >   EDAC is designed to report errors in the core system.
> >   These are low-level errors that are reported in the CPU or
> >   supporting chipset or other subsystems:
> >   memory errors, cache errors, PCI errors, thermal throttling, etc..
> >   If unsure, select 'Y'.
> > 
> > So please explain why your error reporting is so different from the above that it 
> > justifies a separate facility. And you better come up with a real good explanation 
> > other than we looked at EDAC and it did not fit our needs.
> 
> Btw., it's not just about EDAC - the firmware can store Linux events persistently 
> (beyond allowing the firmware to insert its own RAS events), that is obviously 
> _hugely_ useful for kernel debugging in general. We could inject debugging events 
> there and recover them after a crash, etc.

Yes. It can be used by other kernel subsystems other than RAS. A kernel
API is provided already. The design of the kernel API makes it easy to
be used by various kernel subsystems. As the first step, we plan to
support saving kernel log before panic and reading it back after reboot.

Best Regards,
Huang Ying


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/