linux-kernel - Re: [resend][PATCH 2/4] Revert "oom: deprecate oom

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20101026220237.B7DA.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Tue, 26 Oct 2010 22:01:40 +0900 (JST)
From:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc:	kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [resend][PATCH 2/4] Revert "oom: deprecate oom_adj tunable"

> On Mon, 25 Oct 2010, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> 
> > oom_adj is not only used for kernel knob, but also used for
> > application interface. Then, adding new knob is no good
> > reason to deprecate it. Don't do stupid!
> > 
> 
> NACK as a logical follow-up to my NACK for "oom: remove totalpage 
> normalization from oom_badness()"

Huh?

I requested you show us justification. BUT YOU DIDNT. If you have any 
usecase, show us RIGHT NOW. 

Don't speaking sucking crap. If you don't want ignore you. you are busy
than you.

DONT STUPID.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/