[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1288101958.15336.284.camel@twins>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:05:58 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@...gle.com>
Cc: Damien Wyart <damien.wyart@...e.fr>,
Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@...onical.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, tmhikaru@...il.com,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: High CPU load when machine is idle (related to PROBLEM:
Unusually high load average when idle in 2.6.35, 2.6.35.1 and later)
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 14:44 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> a smarter patch will try and avoid that loop.
a1 = a0 * e + a * (1 - e)
a2 = a1 * e + a * (1 - e)
= (a0 * e + a * (1 - e)) * e + a * (1 - e)
= a0 * e^2 + a * (1 - e) * (1 + e)
a3 = a2 * e + a * (1 - e)
= (a0 * e^2 + a * (1 - e) * (1 + e)) * e + a * (1 - e)
= a0 * e^3 + a * (1 - e) * (1 + e + e^2)
an = a0 * e^n + a * (1 - e) * (1 + e + ... + e^n-1)
= a0 * e^n + a * (1 - e) * (1 - e^n)/(1 - e)
= a0 * e^n + a * (1 - e^n)
the trouble seems to be that that is a rather slow function, stuffing
that in a table will either give us very large tables or very coarse
decay.
n: an an * 2048
1: 0.99446 2037
2: 0.98895 2025
4: 0.978023 2003
8: 0.956529 1959
16: 0.914947 1874
32: 0.837128 1714
64: 0.700784 1435
128: 0.491098 1006
256: 0.241177 494
512: 0.0581666 119
1024: 0.00338335 7
2048: 1.14471e-05 0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists