[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1010261113320.1634-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 11:14:52 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Michał Nazarewicz <m.nazarewicz@...sung.com>
cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>, <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] USB: gadget: file_storage: put_device() in error
recovery
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010, [utf-8] MichaÅ Nazarewicz wrote:
> >> + if ((rc = device_create_file(&curlun->dev, &dev_attr_ro)) ||
> >> + (rc = device_create_file(&curlun->dev, &dev_attr_nofua)) ||
> >> + (rc = device_create_file(&curlun->dev, &dev_attr_file)))
> >> + goto out;
> >
> > As long as you're changing these anyway, you may as well use the style
> > most developers seem to prefer:
> >
> > rc = device_create_file(&curlun->dev, &dev_attr_ro);
> > if (rc)
> > goto out;
> > ...
>
> But then it'd be total of 9 lines consisting of three 3-line ifs. I decided
> that it would be more readable with a single if even though it is not compliant
> with coding style. What do you think? I can just resend it.
I think you should change it as I suggested.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists