[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1010261745260.3115@localhost6.localdomain6>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:46:00 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
cc: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"hpa@...ux.intel.com" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>
Subject: Re: Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = -8589361717 ns) in current
git
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 15:58 +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > >
> > > This is strange, tsc is actually stable on your F10h revC.
> >
> > Yes. constant_tsc is among the CPU flags.
>
> constant_tsc only means the TSC is not affected by cpu freq changes.
>
> It has zero relevance to cross-cpu sync of the TSC. The clocksource
> stuff requires your TSC to be synchronous over all your CPUs.
That and not affected by C-States either.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists