linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/5] Add a global synchronization point for pvclock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 26 Oct 2010 10:04:38 -0700
From:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
CC:	Glauber Costa <glommer@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
	Zachary Amsden <zamsden@...hat.com>,
	"Xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <Xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] Add a global synchronization point for pvclock

 On 10/26/2010 01:14 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>  On 10/26/2010 01:30 AM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>> Unfortunately this is breaking Xen save/restore: if you restore on a
>> host which was booted more recently than the save host, causing the
>> system time to be smaller.  The effect is that the domain's time leaps
>> forward to a fixed point, and stays there until the host catches up to
>> the source host...
>
> Shouldn't save/restore also save the timebase?

Xen doesn't guarantee the system time is monotonic across those kinds of
events.  The domain could maintain its own offset to maintain an
illusion of monotonicity, but I think its simpler to just zero
last_value on resume.

    J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/