[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CC71B94.2010802@zytor.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 11:19:00 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
CC: kvm@...r.kernel.org, avi@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: fyi: gcc33-hammer crashes when compiling kvm emulate.c
On 10/26/2010 10:01 AM, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> Not unless they are actively known to break. People get huffy about it
>
> Well they do -- i just found out.
Sounds like a good reason to put in a warning or error.
>> because even if it is known to have problems it doesn't break *their*
>> particular configuration. I'm getting to be of the opinion that people
>> who compile modern kernels with ancient compilers and expect it to work
>> are suffering from some particular kind of insanity -- it's nothing the
>> distros do. The only exception are embedded people who compile with the
>> latest 3.4 gcc; they have explained they do so because newer gccs have
>> too many dependencies (the actual compiler, not the generated code) and
>> for speed.
>
> At least in the old days the main reason for gcc 3 was build speed.
> AKPM and some others used to be fond of that.
>
> 3.x is apparently much faster than 4.x
That is an issue too, as 3.x does a lot fewer optimizations than 4.x.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists