| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 00:55:39 +0200 From: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com> To: Alex Dubov <oakad@...oo.com> Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Subject: Re: memstick: Alternative approach to proposed fixes On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 04:41 +1100, Alex Dubov wrote: > As I was not able to convince myself that profound changes proposed by Maxim > are really necessary, I propose to follow a much milder path with this update > round (as I outlined in my previous emails). It is really sad to see that patchset. > > In this small patchset, I fix a couple of small omissions as well as introduce > support for "extended command" MSPro transfer method (currently enabled for > JMicron, but I'll clear the TI host for this functionality soon). I expect the > current solution to scale trivially for HG and XC transfer methods (I don't > have the spec for the later yet). Indeed small. All the changes in this patchset are really minor and optional. I could have dropped them. I did much more that that. I made the memstick code readable so not only you could understand it I also wrote ms_block.c while adding common support. I made your code use that support. It is really sad that you are doing that. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists