[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1288059184.4024.148.camel@maxim-laptop>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 04:13:04 +0200
From: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com>
To: Alex Dubov <oakad@...oo.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/29] memstick: jmb38x_ms: s/jmb38x_ms/j38ms/g
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 08:58 -0700, Alex Dubov wrote:
>
> --- On Fri, 22/10/10, Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > From: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH 16/29] memstick: jmb38x_ms: s/jmb38x_ms/j38ms/g
> > To: "Alex Dubov" <oakad@...oo.com>
> > Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "LKML" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Maxim Levitsky" <maximlevitsky@...il.com>
> > Received: Friday, 22 October, 2010, 4:53 PM
> > This just makes it easier to type
> > function names
> > while still keeping the meaning
> > Driver name and filenames are left unchanged.
> >
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com>
> > ---
>
> What sort of patch/argument is this?
> Function prefix should match the module name, to be immediately and
> unambiguously identifiable in the stack trace.
In that case maybe rename the module too?
'jmb38x_ms' is just a mouthful as Andrew Morton would say.
I mean if you really really dislike that, I could revert it, but for
peoples sake, whats wrong with that?
Best regards,
Maxim Levitsky
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists