[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101027090921.GB8554@pengutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:09:21 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Cc: Dinh.Nguyen@...escale.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux@....linux.org.uk,
s.hauer@...gutronix.de, valentin.longchamp@...l.ch,
daniel@...aq.de, amit.kucheria@...onical.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: imx: Add some core definitions for MX53
Hello,
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 09:29:59AM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
> > ---
> > arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/iomux-mx53.h | 301 +++++++++++++++++++
> > arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/mx53.h | 433 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> Hi Dinh.
>
> In general, these definitions should not be added until they are
> actually needed by driver code.
ack.
> Also, from my understanding, the mx53 is very similar to the mx51.
> If I'm correct, then they should be sharing the same set of #defines.
Note, I asked for a seperate header file. See
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1051001/focus=1051352
> What is the diff between *mx51.h and *mx53.h?
Just from a quick look at least some base addresses are different.
(e.g. MX51_DEBUG_BASE_ADDRESS = 0x60000000, MX53_DEBUG_BASE_ADDRESS =
0x40000000; SPBA0, AIPS1 and AIPS2 differ, too)
Thanks
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists