[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CC813EF.4030408@pengutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 13:58:39 +0200
From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>
CC: Tomoya MORINAGA <tomoya-linux@....okisemi.com>,
andrew.chih.howe.khor@...el.com, masa-korg@....okisemi.com,
sameo@...ux.intel.com, margie.foster@...el.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
yong.y.wang@...el.com, socketcan-core@...ts.berlios.de,
kok.howg.ewe@...el.com, joel.clark@...el.com,
morinaga526@....okisemi.com, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
chripell@...e.org, qi.wang@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 v2] can: Topcliff: PCH_CAN driver: Fix buildwarnings
On 10/27/2010 01:57 PM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> On 10/27/2010 01:27 PM, Tomoya MORINAGA wrote:
>> On Wednesday, October 27, 2010 3:52 AM : Marc Kleine-Budde and Wolfgang Grandegge wrote:
>>
>> The following is some inarticulate points I have for your questions.
>> Please give me more information.
>>
>>> Do I understand your code correctly? You have a big loop, but only do
>>> two different things at certain values of the loop? Smells fishy.
>> Uh, I can't understand your intention.
>> Please show in detail.
>> This processing does configuration for all message objects.
>
> Not all, but just a few of them. We believe it can be implemented more
> efficiently.
I misread the code...sorry - I'm just writing a longer answer.
cheers, Marc
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 |
Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (263 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists