[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101027135642.GM6017@pengutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:56:42 +0200
From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
To: Eric Bénard <eric@...rea.com>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
amit.kucheria@...onical.com, linux@....linux.org.uk,
Dinh.Nguyen@...escale.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, daniel@...aq.de,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, valentin.longchamp@...l.ch
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: imx: Add some core definitions for MX53
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 03:33:07PM +0200, Eric Bénard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le 27/10/2010 15:22, Sascha Hauer a écrit :
> > That's a way we can go but only if the common name is not MX5 or MX5x.
> > We've done it with the mx21/27 and it failed when the mx25 came out
> > which was completely incompatible. Since then everybody looking at
> > the code must know that mx2x is mx21/27 but not mx25. I suggest
> > something like MX513 instead.
> >
> MX513 is the partnumber of a member of the i.MX51 family so that's maybe
> not the best choice.
Yes, I know. Is MX5_1_3 better? Any other suggestions?
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists