linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86-32: Allocate irq stacks seperate from percpu area

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 27 Oct 2010 16:39:47 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86-32: Allocate irq stacks seperate from percpu area

Le mercredi 27 octobre 2010 à 16:24 +0200, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
> Le mercredi 27 octobre 2010 à 16:00 +0200, Tejun Heo a écrit :
> 
> > Heh, interesting table.  What does the same code say on 64bit?  Is it
> > the same?
> > 
> 
> Yes this is the same

Oops sorry :!)

On 64bit kernel, the 16 'possible but not online' cpus are not on node
0, but balanced between two nodes.

cpu=0 node=1
cpu=1 node=0
cpu=2 node=1
cpu=3 node=0
cpu=4 node=1
cpu=5 node=0
cpu=6 node=1
cpu=7 node=0
cpu=8 node=1
cpu=9 node=0
cpu=10 node=1
cpu=11 node=0
cpu=12 node=1
cpu=13 node=0
cpu=14 node=1
cpu=15 node=0
cpu=16 node=0
cpu=17 node=1
cpu=18 node=0
cpu=19 node=1
cpu=20 node=0
cpu=21 node=1
cpu=22 node=0
cpu=23 node=1
cpu=24 node=0
cpu=25 node=1
cpu=26 node=0
cpu=27 node=1
cpu=28 node=0
cpu=29 node=1
cpu=30 node=0
cpu=31 node=1


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/