[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <4CC8E6D70200002300022D7C@novprvlin0050.provo.novell.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:58:31 -0600
From: "Joey Lee" <jlee@...ell.com>
To: <corentin.chary@...il.com>
Cc: <michel@...nzer.net>, <sedat.dilek@...il.com>,
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
<acpi4asus-user@...ts.sourceforge.net>, <mjg@...hat.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
<platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: drivers/platform/x86:
Backlight-Add-backlight-type-v2.patch
Hi Corentin,
於 三,2010-10-27 於 13:39 +0200,Corentin Chary 提到:
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...glemail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > while testing linux-next I wanted to reactivate the backlight type
> > patches laying in my build-dir.
> >
> > Within 2.6.36-rcX cycle I had successfully tested the backlight type
> > patch [1] with an additional patch for radeon by Michel (posted to
> > dri-devel ML, see [2]).
> >
> > The main patch needs a little refreshing.
> >
> > v2: drivers/platform/x86/asus-laptop.c: Refreshed to fit linux-next
> > (next-20101027)
> >
> >
> > Kind Regards,
> > - Sedat -
> >
> > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/163971/
> > [2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/182352/
> >
>
> Hi,
>
> I think rfkill has the same problem, on some platforms, the platform
> driver will add a rfkill switch, but the network (wlan/wimax/whatever)
> driver may also add one. AFAIK, the platform one is more likely to be
> able to power down the device completly.
>
Agreed your point!
x86/laptop or wmi driver borrow rfkill interface for power control but
confuse with userland applications.
Thank's
Joey Lee
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists