linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] regulator: add support for regulators on the ab8500 MFD

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20101027173340.GA25134@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date:	Wed, 27 Oct 2010 10:33:41 -0700
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Thiago Farina <tfransosi@...il.com>
Cc:	Sundar Iyer <sundar.iyer@...ricsson.com>, lrg@...mlogic.co.uk,
	sameo@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	STEricsson_nomadik_linux@...t.st.com,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
	Bengt JONSSON <bengt.g.jonsson@...ricsson.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] regulator: add support for regulators on the
 ab8500 MFD

On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 02:25:44PM -0200, Thiago Farina wrote:

> Shouldn't be this returning 1 instead of true and 0 instead false
> (since the return type is int not bool)?

There is no reason to do this, logical values are treated as 0 and 1 in
C.  Using false and true is clear and won't cause any difference in
code.

> Maybe like this?
> return (ret & info->mask) ? 1: 0;

No, that's needlessly obfuscated.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/