[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CC8673C.6060706@goop.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 10:54:04 -0700
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: use pgd accessors when cloning a pgd range.
On 10/27/2010 10:44 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 10:31:37AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>>> Xen shouldn't have any users of this, since it's used for low-level
>>> operations like SMP bootstrap, suspend to RAM, reboot and low-level
>>> BIOS functionality.
>>>
>> Right, but it is being called smack in the middle of setup_arch(). It
>> looks like they could be hidden away in
>> native_pagetable_setup_start/done though.
> I think I can put the second sync-back clone_pgd_range in
> native_pagetable_setup_done but the first one needs to take place right
> at the beginning of setup_arch() because a lot of code in-between relies
> on swapper_pg_dir containing proper entries.
OK.
> Just to make sure I understand you correctly: best it would be for xen
> to not have the copy_pgd_range() calls in setup_arch, correct?
Right. Could you put the first copy into swapper_pg_dir earlier, before
setup_arch() somewhere that's specific to booting via head_32.S?
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists