linux-kernel - Re: nfsd changes for 2.6.37

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTimZSj7Y8KUic-VLSgrPFTf5wc_KRdfedzLAkNKT@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:42:55 -0700
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Bryan Schumaker <bjschuma@...app.com>,
	linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: nfsd changes for 2.6.37

On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>
> Ok, then let's use your tree with proper changelogs. That should be the
> easiest way to make sure that the code you test is the one that gets in.

Half of them are yours, and the one that is mine needs the comment
fixup. Can you organize it all for me to pull?

Here's my patch again, with the comment move and a suggested commit
message (and my sign-off and Bruce's tested-by: the only thing that
changed in the patch was literally some comment placement so the
tested-by should still be perfectly valid).

Feel free to edit the message/patch to your hearts content.

  Thanks,
        Linus

View attachment "patch.diff" of type "text/x-patch" (6020 bytes)