linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: imx: Add some core definitions for MX53

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20101027234413.GD32583@pengutronix.de>
Date:	Thu, 28 Oct 2010 01:44:13 +0200
From:	Robert Schwebel <r.schwebel@...gutronix.de>
To:	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
Cc:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	amit.kucheria@...onical.com, linux@....linux.org.uk,
	Dinh.Nguyen@...escale.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, daniel@...aq.de,
	Uwe Kleine-König 
	<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, valentin.longchamp@...l.ch
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: imx: Add some core definitions for MX53

On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 03:22:13PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> That's a way we can go but only if the common name is not MX5 or MX5x.
> We've done it with the mx21/27 and it failed when the mx25 came out
> which was completely incompatible.

And even worse, there is also the MX23 and MX28 in the meantime which
are not i.MX at all: they are a design coming from Sigmatel, bought by
Freescale and only named i.MX due to marketing reasons.

rsc
-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/