[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1288154866.2652.84.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 06:47:46 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] fs: remove inode_lock from iput_final and
prune_icache
Le mercredi 27 octobre 2010 à 05:40 +0100, Al Viro a écrit :
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 03:23:04PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>
> >
> > Now that inode state changes are protected by the inode->i_lock and
> > the inode LRU manipulations by the inode_lru_lock, we can remove the
> > inode_lock from prune_icache and the initial part of iput_final().
> >
> > instead of using the inode_lock to protect the inode during
> > iput_final, use the inode->i_lock instead. This protects the inode
> > against new references being taken while we change the inode state
> > to I_FREEING, as well as preventing prune_icache from grabbing the
> > inode while we are manipulating it. Hence we no longer need the
> > i???ode_lock in iput_final prior to setting I_FREEING on the inode.
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> ... the hell? There's more such damage elsewhere in the thread; what's
> going on?
> --
Maybe its on your side, no problem here on my copy.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists