linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/4] fs: remove inode_lock from iput_final and prune

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1288159762.1985.5.camel@cowboy>
Date:	Wed, 27 Oct 2010 03:09:22 -0300
From:	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@....org>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] fs: remove inode_lock from iput_final and
 prune_icache

On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 07:50 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le mercredi 27 octobre 2010 à 06:25 +0100, Al Viro a écrit :
> > "i\xe1\xb9\x89ode_lock", i.e. 'n' turned into U+1E49, aka "latin small letter
> > n with line below".  I doubt that it's MTA braindamage.
> > 
> > In the first patch there's 
> > 
> > - * invalidate_inodes    - attempt to free all inodes on a
> > + * nvalidate_inodes    - attempt to free all inodes on a
> > 
> > and I _really_ doubt that anything in mail system is capable of something
> > that elaborate.
> 
> Again, I can not see it in my copy, I checked lkml archives too :
> 
Neither can I, the patch is good (from a character point of view).

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/