linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] vhost: TX used buffer guest signal accumulation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:14:22 -0700
From:	Shirley Ma <mashirle@...ibm.com>
To:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] vhost: TX used buffer guest signal accumulation

> Two ideas:
> 1. How about writing out used, just delaying the signal?
>    This way we don't have to queue separately.

This improves some performance, but not as good as delaying
both used and signal. Since delaying used buffers combining
multiple small copies to a large copy, which saves more CPU
utilization and increased some BW.

> 2. How about flushing out queued stuff before we exit
>    the handle_tx loop? That would address most of
>    the spec issue. 

The performance is almost as same as the previous patch. I will resubmit
the modified one, adding vhost_add_used_and_signal_n after handle_tx
loop for processing pending queue.

This patch was a part of modified macvtap zero copy which I haven't
submitted yet. I found this helped vhost TX in general. This pending
queue will be used by DMA done later, so I put it in vq instead of a
local variable in handle_tx.

Thanks
Shirley

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/