linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -v3 0/8] ACPI, APEI patches for 2.6.37

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 27 Oct 2010 08:27:02 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	BorislavPetkov <petkovbb@...glemail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v3 0/8] ACPI, APEI patches for 2.6.37

On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 12:07:30 +0200 Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 13:28 +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
> > v3:
> > 
> > - Rework lock-less memory allocator and lock-less list.
> > 
> > v2:
> > 
> > - Some minor changes according to Andi's comments.
> > 
> > [PATCH -v3 1/8] ACPI, APEI, Add ERST record ID cache
> > [PATCH -v3 2/8] lib, Make gen_pool memory allocator lock-less
> > [PATCH -v3 3/8] lib, Add lock-less NULL terminated single list
> > [PATCH -v3 4/8] Hardware error device core
> > [PATCH -v3 5/8] Hardware error record persistent support
> > [PATCH -v3 6/8] ACPI, APEI, Use ERST for hardware error persisting before panic
> > [PATCH -v3 7/8] ACPI, APEI, Report GHES error record with hardware error device core
> > [PATCH -v3 8/8] ACPI, APEI, Generic Hardware Error Source POLL/IRQ/NMI notification type support
> 
> You forgot to CC all people who participated in the previous discussion.
> 
> You seem to have forgotten to address the high-level feedback given by
> the x86 maintainers.
> 
> All you've done is decreased the arch/x86/ footprint of the patch
> series, but neither you nor Andi have addressed the technical arguments
> against adding this ABI.
> 
> Nor have you engaged in conversation with the other EDAC people on how
> to extend the existing interface, or even work towards creating
> something new that would cater to all interested parties.
> 
> Not charmed at all by your attitude.
> --

Looks like you also have not addressed this reported build error:
  http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/10/25/440

---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/