linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] move arch_init_ideal

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4CC8E6F7.5080405@zytor.com>
Date:	Wed, 27 Oct 2010 19:59:03 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC:	Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>, mingo@...e.hu,
	mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca, tglx@...utronix.de,
	andi@...stfloor.org, roland@...hat.com, rth@...hat.com,
	masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
	avi@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net, vgoyal@...hat.com,
	sam@...nborg.org, tony@...eyournoodle.com,
	ddaney@...iumnetworks.com, dsd@...top.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] move arch_init_ideal_nop5 later

On 10/27/2010 07:11 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 15:24 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> The exception test is broken anyway for reasons I already explained, so it would be better to just drop it.
> 
> Would you be OK if we nuke it for the next merge window? It's been in
> there since 2.6.28, I'd hate to drop it now to discover that it breaks
> something this late in the merge window.
> 

I'd be much happier nuking it now than moving the invocation.  The
latter is much more likely to break things.

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/