[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101028203706.GD28126@thunk.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:37:06 -0400
From: Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To: sedat.dilek@...il.com
Cc: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
sfr@...b.auug.org.au, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Avinash Kurup <kurup.avinash@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [next-20101038] Call trace in ext4
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:15:00PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>
> I created a new ext4.ko via "make M=fs/ext4" in the build-dir and
> copied the the kernel-module to /lib/modules/$(uname
> -r)/kernel/fs/ext4/, is that not enough?
It might not be. Some distributions include modules in the initial
ramdisk, and load the module from the initrd, simply dropping the
module in /lib/modules/<kver>/... might not be enough. So recreating
the initrd and then rebooting might be enough.
Certainly if you drop it there on a running kernel, if you don't
unload the module (before unmounting all of your ext4 file systems),
and then reload the module, *definitely* just copying a module into
/lib/modules.... without making sure the module is reloaded, you'll
still have the old module.
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists