[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1288299878.30131.2.camel@sridhar.beaverton.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 14:04:38 -0700
From: Sridhar Samudrala <sri@...ibm.com>
To: Shirley Ma <mashirle@...ibm.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] vhost: TX used buffer guest signal accumulation
On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 13:13 -0700, Shirley Ma wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 12:32 -0700, Shirley Ma wrote:
> > Also I found a big TX regression for old guest and new guest. For old
> > guest, I am able to get almost 11Gb/s for 2K message size, but for the
> > new guest kernel, I can only get 3.5 Gb/s with the patch and same
> > host.
> > I will dig it why.
>
> The regression is from guest kernel, not from this patch. Tested 2.6.31
> kernel, it's performance is less than 2Gb/s for 2K message size already.
> I will resubmit the patch for review.
>
> I will start to test from 2.6.30 kernel to figure it when TX regression
> induced in virtio_net. Any suggestion which guest kernel I should test
> to figure out this regression?
It would be some change in virtio-net driver that may have improved the
latency of small messages which in turn would have reduced the bandwidth
as TCP could not accumulate and send large packets.
Thanks
Sridhar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists