[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTin9Lzvqw_Dz6b6mywFAOLfoK0P_EfHN9Nchec9j@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:33:41 -0700
From: Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>
To: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"akpm >> Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] cgroups: Allow to bind/unbind subsystems to/from
non-trival hierarchy
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> Paul had a patch to allow some subsystems to be added to multi-hierarchies,
> which may help.
I more or less dropped it since I couldn't see a big use for it - all
the examples I had were more easily implemented as basic cgroup
control files (and hence available in all hierarchies automatically)
> But it forbids accessing t->cgroups, which makes this
> feature of limited use.
Not exactly - it meant that you couldn't do a fast dereference via
t->cgroups to get to your cgroup_subsys_state, since there was no
longer a unique css for each task for that subsystem - there would be
one per mounted instance of the subsystem. Instead it became necessary
to follow a chain of pointers to find the appropriate css for the
hierarchy in question.
In general this also means that it's harder for the multi-bound
subsystem have any real-world meaning - it's mostly useful for
stateless subsystems, or ones where the cgroup_subsys_state contents
have no direct connection with machine-wide data.
Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists