[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTimCD90s+y_6y=LyOL1QqEOOAaT+b2b4guDrzo_g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:55:32 -0700
From: Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>
To: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: "akpm >> Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] cgroups: Allow to bind a subsystem to a cgroup hierarchy
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 1:09 AM, Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> + /*
> + * Indicate if this subsystem can be bound/unbound to/from a cgroup
> + * hierarchy which has child cgroups.
> + */
> + unsigned int can_bind:1;
Maybe call this "bindable"?
Basic idea looks great, it could do with a bunch more comments, and
maybe locking rules.
Is there any chance of a lock inversion between dir->i_mutex and
cgroup_lock in hierarchy_popuiate_dir() ?
Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists