lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 29 Oct 2010 09:50:19 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <>
To:	"Nicholas A. Bellinger" <>
Cc:	Boaz Harrosh <>,
	James Bottomley <>,
	Mike Anderson <>,
	linux-kernel <>,
	linux-scsi <>,
	Vasu Dev <>,
	Tim Chen <>,
	Matthew Wilcox <>,
	Mike Christie <>,
	Jens Axboe <>,
	James Smart <>,
	Andrew Vasquez <>,
	FUJITA Tomonori <>,
	Hannes Reinecke <>,
	Joe Eykholt <>,
	Christoph Hellwig <>,
	Jon Hawley <>,
	Brian King <>,
	Christof Schmitt <>,
	Tejun Heo <>,
	Andrew Morton <>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <>,
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Status of unlocked_qcmds=1 operation for .37

> I would have to agree that approach does make a bit more sense..  Now
> can some brave soul (/me looks at ak) code another script to automate
> this for the identified legacy LLDs cases that need push down..?

For the drivers I looked at it doesn't really make too much difference,
I don't think there was any with a really large number of returns.
You can see that in the diffstat for the full changes.

Writing another script is probably not too hard, but the problem
is that I needed a significant amount of manual post processing
(both the select the right files to patch and to get rid
of misplaced newlines and some mismatches in cocci) 
So it's not a fully automated procedure.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists