[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101029080650.GA11149@basil.fritz.box>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 10:06:51 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Jin Dongming <jin.dongming@...css.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"H.Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>,
LKLM <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] [x86, next] Add mce_ser interface in
/sys/kernel/debug/mce/ for test
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 01:42:09PM +0900, Jin Dongming wrote:
> If we want to test the part of mce handler for SRAO and SRAR, we need to
> have a test machine whose CPU supports MCG_SER_P. If we don't have such
> machine, we can not test the part of mce handler for SRAO and SRAR.
>
> With this interface we can test the part of mce handler for SRAO and SRAR
> by setting mce_ser 1 on the machine which does not support MCG_SER_P.
>
> Usage:
> if val == 1 or val == 0
> Set val to mce_ser.
> else
> Ser the original value to mce_ser.
>
> Note:
> Please don't use mce_ser interface except mce test.
> Because when the real mce exception happened, the unsuitable set
> with this interface maybe change the real process of mce handler and
> lead to a different result.
Basic idea is good (I have been using a similar patch for quite some time).
My patch was a little bit simpler though, not bothering with org_ser:
---
MCE: Add an debugfs interface to force MCA recovery
This is useful to run the MCA recovery test cases using
error injection on a non MCA recovery capable system.
On a system without MCA recovery this should be a nop.
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Index: linux/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
+++ linux/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
@@ -2346,13 +2346,26 @@ static int fake_panic_set(void *data, u6
fake_panic = val;
return 0;
}
+static int mca_recovery_get(void *data, u64 *val)
+{
+ *val = mce_ser;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int mca_recovery_set(void *data, u64 val)
+{
+ mce_ser = val;
+ return 0;
+}
DEFINE_SIMPLE_ATTRIBUTE(fake_panic_fops, fake_panic_get,
fake_panic_set, "%llu\n");
+DEFINE_SIMPLE_ATTRIBUTE(mca_recovery_fops, mca_recovery_get,
+ mca_recovery_set, "%llu\n");
static int __init mcheck_debugfs_init(void)
{
- struct dentry *dmce, *ffake_panic;
+ struct dentry *dmce, *ffake_panic, *fmca_recovery;
dmce = mce_get_debugfs_dir();
if (!dmce)
@@ -2361,7 +2374,10 @@ static int __init mcheck_debugfs_init(vo
&fake_panic_fops);
if (!ffake_panic)
return -ENOMEM;
-
+ fmca_recovery = debugfs_create_file("mca_recovery_force",0644,dmce,NULL,
+ &mca_recovery_fops);
+ if (!fmca_recovery)
+ return -ENOMEM;
return 0;
}
late_initcall(mcheck_debugfs_init);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists