[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1288369108.29632.1.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 12:18:28 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>,
David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>, rth@...hat.com,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
andi@...stfloor.org, roland@...hat.com,
masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
avi@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net, vgoyal@...hat.com,
sam@...nborg.org, tony@...eyournoodle.com, dsd@...top.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] jump label: disable due to compiler bug
On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 09:35 -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> * Steven Rostedt (rostedt@...dmis.org) wrote:
> > Then in the code have:
> >
> > -#if defined(CC_HAVE_ASM_GOTO) && defined(CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_JUMP_LABEL)
> > +#if defined(CC_HAVE_ASM_GOTO) && defined(CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_JUMP_LABEL) \
>
> Technically, you could remove the dependency on
> "defined(CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_JUMP_LABEL)", because it is now dealt with at
> the Kconfig level (CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL depends on it).
Yeah, I noticed that just after hitting send.
>
> > + && defined(JUMP_LABEL)
>
> this would be defined(CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL)
Yep, this too, but thanks for pointing it out.
>
> The rest looks fine,
Great, can I add your acked-by then?
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists