[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1010291728470.1407@kaball-desktop>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 17:28:59 +0100
From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC: Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@...citrix.com>,
"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Juan Quintela <quintela@...hat.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <Jeremy.Fitzhardinge@...rix.com>,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...citrix.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the xen-pvhvm tree with the xen
tree
On Fri, 29 Oct 2010, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the xen-pvhvm tree got a conflict in
> arch/x86/xen/setup.c between commit
> a1857ddc9ba2dfdbfd70171181e481f2f64b8d0b ("xen: do not release any memory
> under 1M in domain 0") from the xen tree and commit
> 4ec5387cc36c6472a2ff2c82e9865abe8cab96c2 ("xen: add the direct mapping
> area for ISA bus access") from the xen-pvhvm tree.
>
> Just differences in a comment. I just used the version from the xen
> tree ...
I think is fine
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists