[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20101029.133759.48489968.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 13:37:59 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: rostedt@...dmis.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, fweisbec@...il.com, jbaron@...hat.com,
ddaney@...iumnetworks.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] jump label: Make arch_jump_label_text_poke_early()
optional
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 09:55:52 -0400
> From: David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>
>
> For the forthcoming MIPS jump label support,
> arch_jump_label_text_poke_early() is unneeded as the MIPS NOP
> instruction is already optimal.
>
> Supply a default implementation that does nothing. Flag x86 and SPARC
> as having arch_jump_label_text_poke_early().
>
> Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
> Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> Signed-off-by: David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>
> LKML-Reference: <1286218615-24011-2-git-send-email-ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
On the SPARC side, it's not that the nop isn't optimal, on sparc it's
always 0x01000000. The issue is that when written an I-cache flush is
necessary using a 'flushi' instruction.
Does MIPS not need a flush when poking instructions? I find this hard
to believe, although it's been some time since I last touched that
architecture :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists