linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/1] RFC: poll/select performance on datagram sockets

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 29 Oct 2010 13:40:58 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	jj@...osbits.net
Cc:	eric.dumazet@...il.com, alban.crequy@...labora.co.uk,
	shemminger@...tta.com, gorcunov@...nvz.org, adobriyan@...il.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	pauli.nieminen@...labora.co.uk, rweikusat@...gmbh.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] RFC: poll/select performance on datagram sockets

From: Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 22:20:12 +0200 (CEST)

> Sorry to intrude out of the blue without really understanding the kernel 
> side of most of the code in question, but if there's a performance 
> regression for applications using poll() shouldn't we address that so we 
> get back to the prior performance level rather than requireing all 
> userspace apps to switch to epoll() ??

For such a pathological program like Alban's test case, I say
absolutely not.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/